| 连光阳.论合同之债请求权时效期间的起算——基于解释论的立场[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(4):47-52 |
| 论合同之债请求权时效期间的起算——基于解释论的立场 |
| Research on the Commencement of Prescription Period of Contractual Claims: Based on the Interpretation Theory |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 时效期间 起算标准 合同之债请求权 作为义务 不作为义务 |
| 英文关键词: prescription period standard of commencement contractual claims under duties to refrain from doing something under duties to doing something |
| 基金项目:2012年湖南省研究生科研创新项目（CX2012B149） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 7758 |
| 全文下载次数: 5044 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 诉讼时效期间的起算点是时效制度中一项尤为重要的构成要素，然而我国相关法律规范对其规定失之简略。合同之债请求权是一项重要的请求权类型，以解释论为路径对其时效期间的起算进行类型化分析，并力图从法技术层面实现债权人与债务人之间利益的平衡，可为分析时效期间的起算提供一个范例，并可为缓和诉讼时效制度与我国传统法律文化之间的紧张关系，为实现时效制度的本土化提供借鉴。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The commencement of prescription period is a principal component of a prescription regime. However, the related provisions in Chinas Civil Law regime are of great curtness. Contractual claim is one of the most important claims, doing classifying analysis on it from the perspective of interpretation theory, and trying to strike the balance between the creditors and the debtors from the legislative skills aspect and providing a model for analyzing the commencement of all types of prescription periods. Moreover, it can relieve the tensions between prescription regime and Chinese traditional legal culture, which will be helpful to achieve the localization of prescription regime. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
