论民事连带责任案件的判决
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

湖南省哲学社会科学基金重点项目(11ZDB073);湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题(10fx06009)


On Judgment for Civil Joint and Several Liability
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    虽然连带责任制度对权利人利益保护的独特优势应得到彰显,但法院在司法裁判时却不能无视实体与程序的差别而一味地满足权利人的诉求,甚至只应权利人的请求而做出裁判,否则会导致程序的虚无,使法院失去其独立性,沦为权利人的司法工具,也使未经裁判不得令其承担责任的责任人失去法律的保护。理性的做法是,针对个性化的权利应注重个性化的司法裁判。在民事连带责任案件的判决中,应合理寻找权利人的权利保护与责任人的权益保障之间的平衡点。在诉讼形式上采固有必要共同诉讼形式,各责任人均需参加诉讼的基础上,统一作出对各责任人或为胜诉或为败诉的判决,同时应对各责任人的责任份额作出明确划分。如此既能提高诉讼效率,避免多余之诉的发生,又能使所有诉讼参与人尽快退出诉讼,从而避免出现相互矛盾的判决。

    Abstract:

    Although the unique advantage of joint and several liability to protect obligee s interests should reveal itself, the court in the judicial adjudication cannot ignore the substantial and procedural differences instead of blindly meeting the obligee s claims, even make the adjudication only for the obligee s request; otherwise, it will cause the application to nothingness, make the court lose its independence and become the obligee’s judicial tool, and it will also make the person responsible lose the protection of law without liability to bear the responsibility of the judgment. A rational approach is that, to individual rights, it should pay attention to the judicial referee personalized. In the joint and several liability judgment of the case, it should seek for the balance point between the protection of the obligee s rights and that of the interests and the rights of the person responsible. In the form of litigation, it should take the inherently necessary joint action form, with each person responsible involved in the proceedings, and make a winning or losing judgment for each person responsible; meanwhile it should clear the responsibility share. In this way, it can not only improve the efficiency of the proceedings and avoid unnecessary litigations, but also make all the participants in the proceedings retreat from the litigations as soon as possible, so as to avoid the conflicting decisions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭熙海.论民事连带责任案件的判决[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(2):70-75

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-03-18