弗雷格迷题的无解性
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD119)


Insolubility of Freges Puzzle
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为真的同一陈述句a=b与a=a在认知价值上有区别。这种区别的根源是什么?弗雷格在《论涵义与指称》中试图从语义的角度来解释。这个问题后来被称作“弗雷格迷题”。其他的哲学家或是从语义方面继承弗雷格的思想,或是从语形方面来解决它。但已有的这两方面的考虑都不能解决弗雷格迷题。若某种语义理论能够解决弗雷格迷题,其自身所存在着的“高阶”弗雷格迷题将迫使它或者不能解决后者,或者会导致不同的符号无法被用于同一陈述。另一方面,从语形出发解释弗雷格迷题的方案,并不比直接规定“这两个表达式的认知价值不同”有更多的优势。从这个意义而言,弗雷格迷题是不可解的。

    Abstract:

    There are cognitive differences between equalities “a=b” and “a=a”. What is the source of these differences? Frege tried to interpret it semantically in his On Sense and Reference. Afterwards this problem was called “Freges Puzzle”. Other Philosophers tried to answer it. They either treated it semantically by inheriting Frege’s method, or treated it syntactically. But so far none of them solved Freges puzzle. If there were some semantic theories which were able in solving Freges puzzle, their intrinsic “higher-order” Freges puzzles would still be insoluble, or it would force that distinct symbols would never be used on equalities. On the other hand, solving Freges puzzle syntactically is not better than merely demanding “these two expressions are cognitively different”. On this sense, Freges puzzle is insoluble.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈星群.弗雷格迷题的无解性[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(3):30-35

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-05-15