对小费三十年之争的考量
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

广州市羊城学者中青年学术带头人项目(12A010G)


On the Thirty Years Debate about “Tip”
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    小费问题在我国争论了30年,历经全盘否定、深入探索、付诸实践三个阶段,但至今尚未真正解决。之所以如此,关键在于其争论焦点“姓社”与“姓资”,问题没有解决好。小费之争悬而未决,充分暴露出我国旅游业发展的窘迫:意识狭隘固执、法律严重滞后、管理进退失当,这是严重制约我国旅游业可持续发展的3块短板。事实上,松绑小费,激发其正能量,就能够破解这些问题,促进我国旅游业健康发展。

    Abstract:

    The debate on “tip” in China has lasted thirty years, which has been experienced three stages, that is, from the stage of being totally repudiated, to the stage of profound exploration, and to the stage of putting into effect. However, it has not been resolved yet, which is rare in the world. The reason for this debate lies in whether or not the “tip” pertains to socialism or capitalism, and whether or not it should dwell on this problem. The above has left unresolved. The debate on “tip” is just the tip of the iceberg, which has exposed the developmental embarrassments of China’s tourism industry. Narrow and stubborn awareness, severely lagging behind law, and management in dilemma are the three short boards that seriously restrict the sustainable development of tourism. In fact, relaxing “tip” and stimulating the positive energy of “tip” can solve the big problems and promote the healthy development of China’s tourism industry.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡幸福.对小费三十年之争的考量[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(3):93-100

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-05-15