In order to combat corruption by rule of law and prevent miscarriages of justice, it is required that the judges review the crime evidence of corruption precisely. Based on the analysis of the corruption crime types, this paper proposes the distinguishing norms of corruption crime in defective evidence and illegal evidence, i.e. “the degree of procedure violation, the objectivity of evidence and the procedural justice”. Thus, the illegally testimonial evidence, the illegal material evidence, the illegal documentary evidence and the defective evidence is applicable to differently exclusionary rules, so as to provide references for effective realization of the goals of anti-corruption by rule of law.